feat: cooked up something fierce
This commit is contained in:
+161
-1
@@ -88,6 +88,16 @@ pub enum Rule {
|
||||
/// An expectation of low discrimination on a higher-level item.
|
||||
ContradictoryDesign,
|
||||
|
||||
// --- the option pool ---
|
||||
/// Fewer usable distractors than a form shows.
|
||||
ThinOptionPool,
|
||||
/// An option that has never been administered and has not been retired.
|
||||
UnusedOption,
|
||||
/// An option retired without saying what it did.
|
||||
UnjustifiedRetirement,
|
||||
/// A distractor that has never been chosen, in any set it appeared in.
|
||||
NonfunctioningDistractor,
|
||||
|
||||
// --- evidence ---
|
||||
/// Statistics describe an older version of the item.
|
||||
StaleCalibration,
|
||||
@@ -104,7 +114,7 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Used by `--list-rules`, and by the test that keeps this list in step with
|
||||
/// the enum.
|
||||
pub const ALL: [Rule; 26] = [
|
||||
pub const ALL: [Rule; 30] = [
|
||||
Rule::KeyIsLongest,
|
||||
Rule::UnevenOptionLength,
|
||||
Rule::WordRepeatCue,
|
||||
@@ -127,6 +137,10 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
Rule::WeakFormatForLevel,
|
||||
Rule::ScoredBonusLevel,
|
||||
Rule::ContradictoryDesign,
|
||||
Rule::ThinOptionPool,
|
||||
Rule::UnusedOption,
|
||||
Rule::UnjustifiedRetirement,
|
||||
Rule::NonfunctioningDistractor,
|
||||
Rule::StaleCalibration,
|
||||
Rule::DifficultyMissed,
|
||||
Rule::DiscriminationMissed,
|
||||
@@ -152,6 +166,9 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
// Statistics attached to text that has since changed are actively
|
||||
// misleading, which is worse than absent.
|
||||
R::StaleCalibration => Severity::High,
|
||||
// An item that cannot fill a form is an item `assemble` will put on
|
||||
// a paper short an option.
|
||||
R::ThinOptionPool => Severity::High,
|
||||
// An unanswerable question for a screen-reader user.
|
||||
R::AssetWithoutAltText => Severity::High,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -178,6 +195,13 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
| R::NoStudentFeedback
|
||||
| R::DifficultyMissed
|
||||
| R::DiscriminationMissed => Severity::Low,
|
||||
|
||||
// A distractor that draws nobody across several administrations is
|
||||
// evidence to act on, not a style note.
|
||||
R::NonfunctioningDistractor => Severity::Medium,
|
||||
// Both are tidiness: the item still works, but its pool is
|
||||
// carrying something nobody has accounted for.
|
||||
R::UnusedOption | R::UnjustifiedRetirement => Severity::Low,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -206,6 +230,10 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
Rule::WeakFormatForLevel => "complete-format-level",
|
||||
Rule::ScoredBonusLevel => "complete-bonus-policy",
|
||||
Rule::ContradictoryDesign => "complete-design-conflict",
|
||||
Rule::ThinOptionPool => "pool-thin",
|
||||
Rule::UnusedOption => "pool-unused",
|
||||
Rule::UnjustifiedRetirement => "pool-unjustified-retirement",
|
||||
Rule::NonfunctioningDistractor => "evidence-nonfunctioning",
|
||||
Rule::StaleCalibration => "evidence-stale",
|
||||
Rule::DifficultyMissed => "evidence-difficulty",
|
||||
Rule::DiscriminationMissed => "evidence-discrimination",
|
||||
@@ -238,9 +266,11 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
| Rule::WeakFormatForLevel
|
||||
| Rule::ScoredBonusLevel
|
||||
| Rule::ContradictoryDesign => "completeness",
|
||||
Rule::ThinOptionPool | Rule::UnusedOption | Rule::UnjustifiedRetirement => "pool",
|
||||
Rule::StaleCalibration
|
||||
| Rule::DifficultyMissed
|
||||
| Rule::DiscriminationMissed
|
||||
| Rule::NonfunctioningDistractor
|
||||
| Rule::DuplicateStem => "evidence",
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -270,6 +300,10 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
Rule::WeakFormatForLevel,
|
||||
Rule::ScoredBonusLevel,
|
||||
Rule::ContradictoryDesign,
|
||||
Rule::ThinOptionPool,
|
||||
Rule::UnusedOption,
|
||||
Rule::UnjustifiedRetirement,
|
||||
Rule::NonfunctioningDistractor,
|
||||
Rule::StaleCalibration,
|
||||
Rule::DifficultyMissed,
|
||||
Rule::DiscriminationMissed,
|
||||
@@ -302,6 +336,12 @@ impl Rule {
|
||||
Rule::WeakFormatForLevel => "true/false at an analytic level",
|
||||
Rule::ScoredBonusLevel => "a level the policy reserves for bonus is scored",
|
||||
Rule::ContradictoryDesign => "low expected discrimination on a higher-level item",
|
||||
Rule::ThinOptionPool => "fewer usable distractors than a form shows",
|
||||
Rule::UnusedOption => "an option has never been administered and is not retired",
|
||||
Rule::UnjustifiedRetirement => "an option was retired without saying what it did",
|
||||
Rule::NonfunctioningDistractor => {
|
||||
"a distractor has never been chosen in any set it appeared in"
|
||||
}
|
||||
Rule::StaleCalibration => "statistics describe an older version of the item",
|
||||
Rule::DifficultyMissed => "observed difficulty was far from predicted",
|
||||
Rule::DiscriminationMissed => "observed discrimination contradicted the prediction",
|
||||
@@ -749,6 +789,87 @@ pub fn lint_item(entry: &Entry, course: &CourseFile, t: &Thresholds) -> Vec<Find
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// --- the option pool
|
||||
// These only make sense once options are a pool, and the pool is where an
|
||||
// item's spare parts sit. A bank that never draws from it will not trip any
|
||||
// of them.
|
||||
if it.format.has_options() {
|
||||
let (keys, distractors) = it.pool();
|
||||
let wanted = course.policy.options_per_item.saturating_sub(1);
|
||||
if distractors.len() < wanted {
|
||||
push(
|
||||
Rule::ThinOptionPool,
|
||||
Severity::High,
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"has {} usable distractor(s) but a form shows {}, so `assemble` will put \
|
||||
this on a paper an option short",
|
||||
distractors.len(),
|
||||
course.policy.options_per_item
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for option in &it.options {
|
||||
match &option.retired {
|
||||
Some(retirement) => {
|
||||
if retirement.reason.trim().len() < 12 {
|
||||
push(
|
||||
Rule::UnjustifiedRetirement,
|
||||
Severity::Low,
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"option `{}` is retired with no real reason. The reason is the \
|
||||
finding — what it drew, or failed to draw — and it is the only \
|
||||
part of a retirement worth anything in two years",
|
||||
option.id
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
// An option nobody has been shown is a draft, and a draft
|
||||
// sitting in an approved item's pool will eventually be
|
||||
// drawn onto a paper without ever having been reviewed
|
||||
// against data.
|
||||
if let Some(history) = it
|
||||
.calibration
|
||||
.as_ref()
|
||||
.filter(|c| !c.options.is_empty())
|
||||
.and_then(|c| c.options.get(&option.id))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if history.never_chosen && history.appearances > 1 {
|
||||
push(
|
||||
Rule::NonfunctioningDistractor,
|
||||
Severity::Medium,
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"option `{}` has appeared in {} option set(s) across {} \
|
||||
examinees and has never been chosen. One administration \
|
||||
would not show this; several do.",
|
||||
option.id, history.appearances, history.n_examinees
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if it
|
||||
.calibration
|
||||
.as_ref()
|
||||
.is_some_and(|c| !c.options.is_empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
push(
|
||||
Rule::UnusedOption,
|
||||
Severity::Low,
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"option `{}` has never been administered. Either it is waiting \
|
||||
its turn, or it was drafted and forgotten — retire it and say \
|
||||
which.",
|
||||
option.id
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
let _ = keys;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// --- evidence
|
||||
if !it.calibration_is_current() {
|
||||
push(
|
||||
@@ -1215,6 +1336,45 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
c
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn a_pool_too_thin_to_fill_a_form_is_flagged() {
|
||||
let c = codes(
|
||||
r#"
|
||||
id: q-a-001
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
level: 2
|
||||
stem: Which mechanism best explains the sigmoidal binding curve?
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { id: o-shift, text: Ligand binding shifts the tetramer to a higher-affinity state, correct: true }
|
||||
- { id: o-fixed, text: Each subunit binds with the same fixed affinity throughout }
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
// Policy shows four options and the pool can supply two, so `assemble`
|
||||
// would put this on a paper two short.
|
||||
assert!(c.contains(&"pool-thin"), "{c:?}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn a_retirement_with_no_finding_is_flagged() {
|
||||
let c = codes(
|
||||
r#"
|
||||
id: q-a-001
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
level: 2
|
||||
stem: Which mechanism best explains the sigmoidal binding curve?
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { id: o-shift, text: Ligand binding shifts the tetramer to a higher-affinity state, correct: true }
|
||||
- { id: o-fixed, text: Each subunit binds with the same fixed affinity throughout }
|
||||
- { id: o-consumed, text: "Ligand is consumed as it binds, depleting the available pool" }
|
||||
- { id: o-oxidation, text: The heme iron changes oxidation state upon binding }
|
||||
- { id: o-cooperative, text: Subunits bind independently of one another, retired: { 'on': 2026-09-20, reason: bad } }
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(c.contains(&"pool-unjustified-retirement"), "{c:?}");
|
||||
// Four live distractors is enough for a four-option form.
|
||||
assert!(!c.contains(&"pool-thin"), "{c:?}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn clean_item_passes() {
|
||||
let c = codes(
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user